Sellers Can Fill a Void
Sellers Can Fill a Void
If you’re working with sellers who have seen offers collapse because buyers can’t get a mortgage loan, you might want to suggest they consider offering some variation of seller financing. If structured carefully, seller financing not only makes deals possible but also can typically help transactions close quickly, as less due diligence is required. After all, who knows the property better than the sellers?
There are other perks, too: Sellers can often negotiate an interest rate that’s more favorable than would be available for other sorts of investments. And they might also get a higher selling price as compensation for assisting the buyers. Finally, there can be some tax benefits; if the seller structures the loan as an installment sale, for example, there can be tax advantages based on how recognition of the capital gain is timed.
But against these benefits is the big downside of seller financing: the potential for buyer default. This risk is compounded if the deal is structured as a wrap-around deed of trust, as many are. With a wrap-around deed of trust, the seller issues a promissory note and deed of trust for the dollar gap between the amount of the first mortgage and the buyer’s down payment. When structured this way, the seller’s performance on the underlying first mortgage is linked to the buyer’s performance. If the buyer defaults, the seller will likely default, too.
Here are some ways to help sellers minimize such pitfalls, no matter how the transaction is structured.
- Request a credit report and credit references. Sellers can get a credit report from any credit reporting agency, but they’ll want to get a signed consent letter from the buyer first. For credit references, one place to go is the buyer’s landlord, if they’re renting. Sellers should also ask for independently audited financial statements.
- Consider loan assumption. In many cases, the seller’s existing mortgage loan has a due-on-sale clause that requires the principal to be paid upon sale of the property. Having to settle their own financing makes it hard for many sellers to offer financing, especially if they’re buying a house themselves and need their sale proceeds to make their own down payment. In these cases, it might be better to simply have the buyer assume the seller’s existing loan. The buyer still must submit to the lender’s underwriting analysis and get the lender to approve a modification, but the process should be less time-consuming than if they were applying for new financing.
- Provide expanded remedies. For many sellers, the only remedy for buyer default included in their loan documents is foreclosure. But it’s best to include lower-level remedies so foreclosure doesn’t have to be the only option. Suggest that sellers set rules for imposing late charges or default interest. Or suggest that sellers hire a property manager to keep track of incoming payments and to spearhead collection efforts, because these activities can be time-consuming.
- Understand the risks to buyers, too. Although it might seem like most risks are on the sellers’ side since they’re putting their resources on the line, there are risks to buyers as well—and if you’re working with buyers, you’ll want to be aware of them. First, buyers could pay the loan in full but still not receive title if there are encumbrances that were never divulged by the seller. Second, if the transaction is structured as a wrap-around deed of trust and the sellers are supposed to be making payments on senior debt, the buyers could be at risk if the sellers fail to make their loan payments, even if the buyers are scrupulous in holding up their end of the deal. Third, buyers might not have the protection of a home inspection, mortgage insurance, or an appraisal to ensure they’re not paying too much.
These are challenging times in credit markets, so there’s a role for seller financing. But be aware of risks so you can help protect your clients.